Search...

⌘K

Try AI Medical Scribe

Save 2+ hours daily with instant clinal dicumentation.

Start Free Trial

All tools /

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)

RASS

Monitors sedation and agitation in critical care

All tools /

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)

RASS

Monitors sedation and agitation in critical care

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)
Assesses level of alertness and calmness in critically ill patients.
Select Patient's Level
RASS — —
0/1 answered · select option to update

Instructions

The RASS is a validated tool used in intensive care units to assess the level of a patient’s agitation or sedation. Begin by observing the patient’s behavior. If the patient is not alert, call their name and observe eye contact. If unresponsive, provide physical stimulation (shoulder shake or sternal rub). The clinician assigns a score from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable) based on observed responsiveness. RASS should be assessed regularly to monitor sedation depth, adjust sedative medications, and ensure patient safety.

Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences

Interpretation

Score

Description

+4

Combative: overtly violent, danger to staff

+3

Very agitated: pulls/removes tubes, aggressive

+2

Agitated: frequent non-purposeful movement, fights ventilator

+1

Restless: anxious, not aggressive

0

Alert and calm

-1

Drowsy: not fully alert, sustained eye contact >10 sec

-2

Light sedation: briefly awakens, eye contact <10 sec

-3

Moderate sedation: movement/eye opening to voice, no eye contact

-4

Deep sedation: movement/eye opening to physical stimulation only

-5

Unarousable: no response to voice or physical stimulation

The Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS) is a 10-point scale from +4 (combative) to −5 (unarousable), developed by a multidisciplinary ICU team and validated for interrater reliability and validity across medical and surgical ICU populations, including ventilated and non‑ventilated patients

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/196696

The original validation reported excellent interrater reliability (e.g., r≈0.96; κ≈0.73–0.80) and strong correlations with visual analog scales and other sedation scales (Ramsay, SAS), supporting construct and criterion validity and ease of use by nurses and physicians
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12421743/

Multicenter pediatric studies found excellent interrater reliability (weighted κ≈0.83–0.95) and strong correlations with COMFORT‑B and numeric rating scales, supporting RASS as a valid tool for sedation/agitation monitoring in PICUs, with responsiveness to sedative dose changes

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5080705/

Critical care guidelines endorse RASS (or SAS) as the primary bedside tool to assess depth of sedation in ICU patients; when deep sedation or neuromuscular blockade precludes behavioral scales, EEG/BIS may supplement assessment

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8918705/

Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences

The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is a simple 10-point scale developed to standardize the assessment of patient consciousness and sedation in the ICU. It helps clinicians monitor patients receiving mechanical ventilation or sedative infusions and ensures that sedation is neither too deep (causing complications such as prolonged ventilation) nor too light (leading to agitation or accidental device removal).

RASS is widely validated across different patient groups, including medical, surgical, and trauma patients, and is often used in conjunction with delirium screening tools such as the CAM-ICU. It offers consistency in sedation titration, enhances patient safety, and improves communication among care teams.

Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences

Interpretation

Score

Description

+4

Combative: overtly violent, danger to staff

+3

Very agitated: pulls/removes tubes, aggressive

+2

Agitated: frequent non-purposeful movement, fights ventilator

+1

Restless: anxious, not aggressive

0

Alert and calm

-1

Drowsy: not fully alert, sustained eye contact >10 sec

-2

Light sedation: briefly awakens, eye contact <10 sec

-3

Moderate sedation: movement/eye opening to voice, no eye contact

-4

Deep sedation: movement/eye opening to physical stimulation only

-5

Unarousable: no response to voice or physical stimulation

The Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS) is a 10-point scale from +4 (combative) to −5 (unarousable), developed by a multidisciplinary ICU team and validated for interrater reliability and validity across medical and surgical ICU populations, including ventilated and non‑ventilated patients

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/196696

The original validation reported excellent interrater reliability (e.g., r≈0.96; κ≈0.73–0.80) and strong correlations with visual analog scales and other sedation scales (Ramsay, SAS), supporting construct and criterion validity and ease of use by nurses and physicians
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12421743/

Multicenter pediatric studies found excellent interrater reliability (weighted κ≈0.83–0.95) and strong correlations with COMFORT‑B and numeric rating scales, supporting RASS as a valid tool for sedation/agitation monitoring in PICUs, with responsiveness to sedative dose changes

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5080705/

Critical care guidelines endorse RASS (or SAS) as the primary bedside tool to assess depth of sedation in ICU patients; when deep sedation or neuromuscular blockade precludes behavioral scales, EEG/BIS may supplement assessment

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8918705/

Frequently Asked Questions

Features and Services FAQs

Discover the full range of features and services we offer and how to use them.

How often should RASS be assessed?+
Can RASS be used in non-ICU patients?+
What is the ideal RASS target for ventilated patients?+
Is RASS used alone to assess delirium?+
Can RASS replace GCS?+
Why is RASS preferred over subjective sedation scales?+

Ready to Transform Your Practice?

Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.

14-day free trial • No setup fees

Ready to Transform Your Practice?

Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.

14-day free trial • No setup fees

Ready to Transform Your Practice?

Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.

14-day free trial • No setup fees

DocScrib

AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.

Product

How It Works

Pricing

FAQ

Articles

Blog

Security

Support

Contact Support

Sales Inquiries

1-800-DOCSCRIB

Help Center

Comparisons

vs Soaper

vs Freed

vs ChartNote

vs NoteMD

vs Heidi

vs Nabla

vs Doximity

vs Suki

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Security & Compliance

Legal Inquiries

© 2025 DocScrib. All rights reserved.

Privacy

Terms

Security

DocScrib

AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.

Product

How It Works

Pricing

FAQ

Articles

Blog

Security

Support

Contact Support

Sales Inquiries

1-800-DOCSCRIB

Help Center

Comparisons

vs Soaper

vs Freed

vs ChartNote

vs NoteMD

vs Heidi

vs Nabla

vs Doximity

vs Suki

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Security & Compliance

Legal Inquiries

© 2025 DocScrib. All rights reserved.

Privacy

Terms

Security

DocScrib

AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.

Product

How It Works

Pricing

FAQ

Articles

Blog

Security

Support

Contact Support

Sales Inquiries

1-800-DOCSCRIB

Help Center

Comparisons

vs Soaper

vs Freed

vs ChartNote

vs NoteMD

vs Heidi

vs Nabla

vs Doximity

vs Suki

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Security & Compliance

Legal Inquiries

© 2025 DocScrib. All rights reserved.

Privacy

Terms

Security

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (Combined MELD)