Search...
⌘K

qSOFA (Quick SOFA) Score for Sepsis
qSOFA (Quick SOFA) Score for Sepsis
Rapid bedside tool to identify sepsis risk in acutely ill patients

qSOFA (Quick SOFA) Score for Sepsis
qSOFA (Quick SOFA) Score for Sepsis
Rapid bedside tool to identify sepsis risk in acutely ill patients
Instructions
Evaluate three bedside criteria: altered mental status, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate. Assign one point for each abnormal value. Add the total score and use the interpretation table to estimate risk of sepsis-related mortality and the need for further assessment.
Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences
Interpretation
Score | Risk of Poor Outcome |
0–1 | Low risk; monitor and assess further if infection suspected |
≥2 | High risk; increased likelihood of sepsis-related mortality and need for urgent evaluation |
The Sepsis-3 task force defined sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to infection (SOFA increase ≥2), and introduced qSOFA (RR≥22/min, altered mentation, SBP≤100mmHg) as a simple bedside prompt to identify infected patients at higher risk for poor outcomes outside the ICU; positive qSOFA should trigger evaluation for organ dysfunction and consideration of escalated care.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26903338/
In the Sepsis-3 data analyses across large EHR cohorts, qSOFA had better prognostic discrimination for in-hospital mortality than SIRS outside the ICU, while full SOFA outperformed both within the ICU; qSOFA is intended as a prompt, not a diagnostic definition.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2492881
A meta-analysis of 26 studies (n≈62,338) found qSOFA had pooled sensitivity 0.46 and specificity 0.82 for mortality prediction, indicating high specificity but limited sensitivity; authors note risk of misses if used as a sole screen and suggest considering lower cutoffs or adding lactate in some contexts.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0266755
Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences
The qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score is a simplified bedside tool developed to rapidly identify patients at risk of poor outcomes from sepsis outside of intensive care units. It was introduced as part of the Sepsis-3 definitions in 2016 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Unlike the full SOFA score, which requires laboratory data, qSOFA relies only on clinical signs that can be assessed quickly and without specialized equipment.
The three criteria are: respiratory rate ≥22/min, altered mentation (Glasgow Coma Scale <15), and systolic blood pressure ≤100 mmHg. Each abnormality scores one point, with a maximum score of 3. A qSOFA score of 2 or more is associated with an increased risk of sepsis-related mortality and prolonged ICU stay. The tool serves as a screening instrument to prompt clinicians to investigate further, initiate early resuscitation, and consider escalation of care.
qSOFA is particularly useful in emergency departments, general wards, and pre-hospital settings where rapid decisions are essential. Its simplicity allows non-specialists to recognize deteriorating patients quickly. While not diagnostic of sepsis itself, qSOFA functions as a red flag that additional evaluation with laboratory tests, full SOFA scoring, and microbiological workup is warranted.
Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences
Interpretation
Score | Risk of Poor Outcome |
0–1 | Low risk; monitor and assess further if infection suspected |
≥2 | High risk; increased likelihood of sepsis-related mortality and need for urgent evaluation |
The Sepsis-3 task force defined sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to infection (SOFA increase ≥2), and introduced qSOFA (RR≥22/min, altered mentation, SBP≤100mmHg) as a simple bedside prompt to identify infected patients at higher risk for poor outcomes outside the ICU; positive qSOFA should trigger evaluation for organ dysfunction and consideration of escalated care.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26903338/
In the Sepsis-3 data analyses across large EHR cohorts, qSOFA had better prognostic discrimination for in-hospital mortality than SIRS outside the ICU, while full SOFA outperformed both within the ICU; qSOFA is intended as a prompt, not a diagnostic definition.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2492881
A meta-analysis of 26 studies (n≈62,338) found qSOFA had pooled sensitivity 0.46 and specificity 0.82 for mortality prediction, indicating high specificity but limited sensitivity; authors note risk of misses if used as a sole screen and suggest considering lower cutoffs or adding lactate in some contexts.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0266755
Frequently Asked Questions
Features and Services FAQs
Discover the full range of features and services we offer and how to use them.
Ready to Transform Your Practice?
Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.
14-day free trial • No setup fees
Ready to Transform Your Practice?
Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.
14-day free trial • No setup fees
Ready to Transform Your Practice?
Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.
14-day free trial • No setup fees
DocScrib
AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.
DocScrib
AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.
DocScrib
AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.