Wells' Criteria for DVT

Wells' Criteria for DVT

Estimates likelihood of deep vein thrombosis

Wells' Criteria for DVT

Wells' Criteria for DVT

Estimates likelihood of deep vein thrombosis

Active cancer (treatment ongoing or within previous 6 months or palliative)
Paralysis, paresis, or recent immobilization of lower extremity
Recently bedridden for 3+ days or major surgery within 12 weeks
Localized tenderness along the distribution of the deep venous system
Entire leg swelling
Calf swelling by > 3 cm compared to asymptomatic leg (measured 10 cm below tibial tuberosity)
Pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg
Collateral (nonvaricose) superficial veins present
Previously documented DVT
Alternative diagnosis at least as likely as DVT
Wells' Score 0Low probability (DVT unlikely, consider D-dimer)
0/10 answered · tap options to update (-2 to 9)

Instructions

Review patient’s history, symptoms, and physical examination. Assign points for each clinical feature present, based on the Wells’ criteria. Add the total score and compare with the interpretation table to estimate the probability of DVT. Use the score to guide decisions on further imaging and diagnostic testing.

Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences

Interpretation

Score

Probability (3-level model)

≤0

Low probability (~5%)

1–2

Moderate probability (~17%)

≥3

High probability (~53%)

 

NICE summarizes and operationalizes the 2-level Wells rule for suspected DVT with the original item points and the dichotomized categories: DVT likely (≥2) vs DVT unlikely (≤1); items include active cancer, paralysis/immobilization, recent surgery/bed rest, localized tenderness, entire leg swelling, calf swelling ≥3cm, pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg, collateral superficial veins, prior DVT, and minus 2 points if an alternative diagnosis is at least as likely.
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng158/chapter/recommendations

A JAMA Internal Medicine analysis reported markedly lower efficiency of the Wells score in inpatients compared with the original outpatient validation cohorts, underscoring setting-specific performance and the need to combine with D‑dimer and imaging pathways in hospitalized patients

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2294236

A trauma cohort external validation found a strong linear correlation between Wells score and DVT incidence; a score ≤1 had very high sensitivity and NPV for ruling out DVT in that setting, while specificity decreased in higher score groups due to aggressive prophylaxis, illustrating context effects.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4898382/

A prospective validation of combinations showed that pairing the (modified) Wells rule with D‑dimer maintains high sensitivity (≈97%) but low specificity for recurrent DVT, supporting its safety as an initial rule-out strategy with confirmatory imaging reserved for positives.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7497055/

Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences

Wells’ Criteria for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is a validated clinical prediction tool designed to estimate the pretest probability of DVT in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism. Developed by Dr. Philip Wells and colleagues in the 1990s, the score is based on clinical risk factors and examination findings such as leg swelling, tenderness along the deep venous system, and history of immobilization or prior DVT. It also incorporates the possibility of alternative diagnoses being more likely than DVT, which subtracts points from the total score.

The tool classifies patients into probability groups: low, moderate, or high, or into a simplified two-level model of “DVT unlikely” versus “DVT likely.” This stratification helps clinicians decide whether to order confirmatory tests such as D-dimer assays, venous duplex ultrasonography, or advanced imaging. For instance, in patients with a low Wells’ score and a negative D-dimer, DVT can often be excluded without the need for imaging. Conversely, in patients with a high score, imaging is prioritized regardless of D-dimer results.

Wells’ Criteria are widely adopted in emergency departments, hospital wards, and outpatient clinics as part of standardized venous thromboembolism workups. While the score improves efficiency and reduces unnecessary testing, it should always be used in conjunction with clinical judgment. Patient-specific variables such as age, comorbidities, anticoagulation status, or atypical presentations can affect its accuracy.

Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences

Interpretation

Score

Probability (3-level model)

≤0

Low probability (~5%)

1–2

Moderate probability (~17%)

≥3

High probability (~53%)

 

NICE summarizes and operationalizes the 2-level Wells rule for suspected DVT with the original item points and the dichotomized categories: DVT likely (≥2) vs DVT unlikely (≤1); items include active cancer, paralysis/immobilization, recent surgery/bed rest, localized tenderness, entire leg swelling, calf swelling ≥3cm, pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg, collateral superficial veins, prior DVT, and minus 2 points if an alternative diagnosis is at least as likely.
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng158/chapter/recommendations

A JAMA Internal Medicine analysis reported markedly lower efficiency of the Wells score in inpatients compared with the original outpatient validation cohorts, underscoring setting-specific performance and the need to combine with D‑dimer and imaging pathways in hospitalized patients

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2294236

A trauma cohort external validation found a strong linear correlation between Wells score and DVT incidence; a score ≤1 had very high sensitivity and NPV for ruling out DVT in that setting, while specificity decreased in higher score groups due to aggressive prophylaxis, illustrating context effects.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4898382/

A prospective validation of combinations showed that pairing the (modified) Wells rule with D‑dimer maintains high sensitivity (≈97%) but low specificity for recurrent DVT, supporting its safety as an initial rule-out strategy with confirmatory imaging reserved for positives.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7497055/

Frequently Asked Questions

Features and Services FAQs

Discover the full range of features and services we offer and how to use them.

How many points are in Wells’ DVT Criteria?+
Can Wells’ score alone confirm DVT?+
What if my patient has cancer?+
How do I interpret a low score with a negative D-dimer?+
Can it be applied to upper extremity DVT?+
What if the alternative diagnosis is more likely?+

Ready to Transform Your Practice?

Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.

14-day free trial • No setup fees

Ready to Transform Your Practice?

Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.

14-day free trial • No setup fees

Ready to Transform Your Practice?

Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.

14-day free trial • No setup fees

DocScrib

AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.

© 2025 DocScrib. All rights reserved.

DocScrib

AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.

© 2025 DocScrib. All rights reserved.

DocScrib

AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.

© 2025 DocScrib. All rights reserved.