Search...
⌘K

FENa
FENa
Used to distinguish prerenal from intrinsic acute kidney injury by measuring how much filtered sodium is excreted

FENa
FENa
Used to distinguish prerenal from intrinsic acute kidney injury by measuring how much filtered sodium is excreted
Instructions
To calculate, input urine sodium, plasma sodium, urine creatinine, and plasma creatinine. The formula expresses the percentage of sodium filtered at the glomerulus that appears in urine. Ensure all values are measured in consistent units for accuracy. This tool should be interpreted alongside clinical findings and other laboratory markers for best decision-making.
Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences
Interpretation
FENa (%) | Interpretation |
< 1% | Suggests prerenal azotemia (hypoperfusion, dehydration, heart failure) |
1–2% | Indeterminate, requires clinical correlation |
> 2% | Suggests intrinsic renal injury (e.g., ATN) |
Fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) estimates the percentage of filtered sodium excreted in urine: FENa = (Urine Na × Plasma Cr) / (Plasma Na × Urine Cr) × 100; a classic cutoff uses FENa <1% to suggest sodium avidity (often labeled “prerenal”) and >1–2% to suggest intrinsic tubular injury, especially acute tubular necrosis
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9269665/
A contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis found that FENa has good accuracy only in oliguric patients without CKD and not receiving diuretics; pooled sensitivity/specificity were 95%/91% in this ideal subgroup but fell to 83%/66% when CKD and diuretics were included, underscoring limited generalizability
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9269645/
Diuretics and CKD blunt FENa’s specificity for prerenal physiology; FEUrea (<35–40%) performs better than FENa in diuretic-treated patients for distinguishing prerenal from intrinsic AKI in several studies and meta-analyses
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19887835/
In sepsis, FENa is commonly low (<1%) despite intrinsic injury; studies suggest lower cutoffs (e.g., ~0.5%) and only moderate accuracy, so FENa should not be relied upon to classify septic AKI
Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences
The Fractional Excretion of Sodium (FENa) is a diagnostic tool used in nephrology to evaluate the cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). By assessing the kidney’s handling of sodium, FENa helps differentiate between prerenal azotemia, typically due to reduced renal perfusion, and intrinsic renal damage, such as acute tubular necrosis (ATN). The principle behind FENa lies in the fact that in states of hypoperfusion, the kidneys conserve sodium to maintain intravascular volume, resulting in a low FENa. Conversely, when the tubules are damaged, the ability to reabsorb sodium is impaired, leading to higher sodium excretion and a higher FENa.
Clinical application of FENa is particularly valuable in guiding fluid management, determining the need for further investigations, and avoiding unnecessary interventions. It is important to note limitations: FENa is less reliable in patients on diuretics, chronic kidney disease, or non-oliguric states. In such cases, other measures such as the Fractional Excretion of Urea (FEUrea) may be more accurate. Despite these caveats, FENa remains a simple, cost-effective, and widely used calculation in clinical practice for rapid assessment of renal function dynamics.
Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences
Interpretation
FENa (%) | Interpretation |
< 1% | Suggests prerenal azotemia (hypoperfusion, dehydration, heart failure) |
1–2% | Indeterminate, requires clinical correlation |
> 2% | Suggests intrinsic renal injury (e.g., ATN) |
Fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) estimates the percentage of filtered sodium excreted in urine: FENa = (Urine Na × Plasma Cr) / (Plasma Na × Urine Cr) × 100; a classic cutoff uses FENa <1% to suggest sodium avidity (often labeled “prerenal”) and >1–2% to suggest intrinsic tubular injury, especially acute tubular necrosis
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9269665/
A contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis found that FENa has good accuracy only in oliguric patients without CKD and not receiving diuretics; pooled sensitivity/specificity were 95%/91% in this ideal subgroup but fell to 83%/66% when CKD and diuretics were included, underscoring limited generalizability
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9269645/
Diuretics and CKD blunt FENa’s specificity for prerenal physiology; FEUrea (<35–40%) performs better than FENa in diuretic-treated patients for distinguishing prerenal from intrinsic AKI in several studies and meta-analyses
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19887835/
In sepsis, FENa is commonly low (<1%) despite intrinsic injury; studies suggest lower cutoffs (e.g., ~0.5%) and only moderate accuracy, so FENa should not be relied upon to classify septic AKI
Frequently Asked Questions
Features and Services FAQs
Discover the full range of features and services we offer and how to use them.
Ready to Transform Your Practice?
Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.
14-day free trial • No setup fees
Ready to Transform Your Practice?
Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.
14-day free trial • No setup fees
Ready to Transform Your Practice?
Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.
14-day free trial • No setup fees
DocScrib
AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.
DocScrib
AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.
DocScrib
AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.