Search...

⌘K

Try AI Medical Scribe

Save 2+ hours daily with instant clinal dicumentation.

Start Free Trial

Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) for Clinical Deterioration

MEWS

Detects early clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients

Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) for Clinical Deterioration

MEWS

Detects early clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients

Systolic BP (mmHg)
Heart Rate (bpm)
Respiratory Rate (breaths/min)
Temperature (°C)
AVPU
MEWS Score
0/5 answered · select options to update

Instructions

The MEWS tool is used to monitor patients’ vital signs and identify early clinical deterioration. Record heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, and level of consciousness. Assign a score for each parameter and add them for the total MEWS.

Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences

Interpretation

MEWS Score

Interpretation

0–2

Low risk: routine monitoring

3–4

Moderate risk: increased monitoring, consider clinical review

5 or more

High risk: urgent clinical review, possible ICU transfer

Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. QJM. 2001;94(10):521–526. Introduced and validated the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in acute medical patients; higher MEWS associated with increased ICU admission and mortality; MEWS ≥5 identified patients at higher risk of adverse outcomes.
https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article-abstract/94/10/521/1558977?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false

Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, et al. Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(4):667–679. Early systematic review showing EWS (including MEWS) associated with earlier recognition and potential reduction in cardiac arrest rates when embedded in response systems. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-007-0532-3

Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences

The Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) is a clinical scoring system designed to detect early signs of patient deterioration and guide timely interventions. It was developed to support decision-making in general hospital wards by using vital sign abnormalities to predict the risk of adverse outcomes such as cardiac arrest, unplanned intensive care admission, or death.

MEWS evaluates five key parameters: systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and level of consciousness (AVPU: Alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive). Each parameter is scored from 0 to 3 depending on how far it deviates from the normal range. The scores are summed, yielding a total MEWS that can range from 0 upward, with higher scores reflecting greater physiological instability.

The main strength of MEWS lies in its simplicity and clinical utility. It allows healthcare providers, including nurses and junior doctors, to quickly recognize changes in patient status. Evidence suggests that routine monitoring using MEWS can reduce delays in escalation of care and improve patient outcomes. It also provides an objective way to trigger rapid response team activation or more frequent monitoring, depending on hospital protocols.

Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences

Interpretation

MEWS Score

Interpretation

0–2

Low risk: routine monitoring

3–4

Moderate risk: increased monitoring, consider clinical review

5 or more

High risk: urgent clinical review, possible ICU transfer

Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. QJM. 2001;94(10):521–526. Introduced and validated the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in acute medical patients; higher MEWS associated with increased ICU admission and mortality; MEWS ≥5 identified patients at higher risk of adverse outcomes.
https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article-abstract/94/10/521/1558977?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false

Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, et al. Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(4):667–679. Early systematic review showing EWS (including MEWS) associated with earlier recognition and potential reduction in cardiac arrest rates when embedded in response systems. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-007-0532-3

Frequently Asked Questions

Features and Services FAQs

Discover the full range of features and services we offer and how to use them.

What does MEWS stand for?+
Which vital signs are included in MEWS?+
What is the maximum MEWS score?+
What MEWS score is concerning?+
How often should MEWS be recorded?+
Can MEWS be used in outpatient settings?+

Ready to Transform Your Practice?

Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.

14-day free trial • No setup fees

Ready to Transform Your Practice?

Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.

14-day free trial • No setup fees

Ready to Transform Your Practice?

Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.

14-day free trial • No setup fees

DocScrib

AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.

© 2025 DocScrib. All rights reserved.

DocScrib

AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.

© 2025 DocScrib. All rights reserved.

DocScrib

AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.

© 2025 DocScrib. All rights reserved.

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (Combined MELD)