Updated on: July 14, 2025
Introduction
As digital healthcare rapidly evolves, choosing the right Electronic Health Record (EHR) system has become a mission-critical decision for clinics, hospitals, and private practices alike. Among the vast sea of EHR vendors, Epic Systems and AdvancedMD stand out as two of the most widely discussed solutions—each serving distinctly different user groups, practice sizes, and interoperability needs.
In this comprehensive comparison, we evaluate Epic and AdvancedMD based on:
- Market fit and scalability
- Core features and clinical workflow
- Integration capabilities
- Pricing models
- User experience
- Security and compliance
- Customer support
- Real-world use cases
- Pros and cons
Whether you’re running a multi-specialty hospital or a solo private practice, this guide will help you determine which EHR is better aligned with your organization’s needs.
Market Overview: Epic vs AdvancedMD
| Metric | Epic Systems | AdvancedMD |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1979 | 1999 |
| Target Audience | Large hospitals, health systems | Small to mid-sized practices |
| Market Share (Acute-Care) | ~36–42% (2024) | Niche, under 5% in outpatient care |
| Number of Providers | 250,000+ | 65,000+ |
| Cloud-Based | Hybrid (Primarily On-Prem) | 100% Cloud |
| Interoperability | Carequality, TEFCA Compliant | HL7, FHIR APIs |
| Specialty Support | High (45+ specialties) | Moderate (20+ specialties) |
Use Case: Who They Serve Best
Epic
Ideal for:
- Health systems, ACOs, large hospitals
- Multi-location or academic medical centers
- Organizations requiring tight integration between departments (lab, pharmacy, radiology, etc.)
Example: Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Kaiser Permanente use Epic for its scalability and centralized architecture.
AdvancedMD
Ideal for:
- Independent practices, solo physicians
- Outpatient clinics, behavioral health, chiropractors
- Practices with limited IT infrastructure
Example: A 5-provider dermatology clinic leverages AdvancedMD for simplified billing, ePrescriptions, and telehealth in a single cloud platform.
Core Features Comparison
| Feature | Epic | AdvancedMD |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Notes | SmartTools, NoteWriter | Customizable templates, voice-to-text |
| e-Prescribing | Surescripts, drug interaction alerts | eRx with EPCS integration |
| Patient Portal | MyChart | AdvancedPatient |
| Scheduling | Integrated with Epic Radiant | Drag-and-drop scheduler |
| Telehealth | Built-in via Epic Video Visit | Zoom-based native integration |
| Revenue Cycle Management | Epic Resolute | Built-in with billing automation |
| Mobile App | Haiku/Canto for iOS/Android | Full-featured iOS/Android apps |
| Specialty Templates | Extensive specialty library | Basic to moderate specialty support |
Feature Highlights
Epic SmartTools & NoteWriter
Epic’s clinical documentation suite uses SmartTexts, SmartLinks, and SmartPhrases to automate SOAP notes, reducing clinician burnout and documentation time.
AdvancedMD’s Mobile Accessibility
Unlike Epic’s segmented mobile suite, AdvancedMD provides complete mobile access to scheduling, charting, and billing via a single unified app—ideal for solo and traveling physicians.
Chart: Feature Satisfaction Ratings
| Feature Category | Epic (G2 Rating /5) | AdvancedMD (G2 Rating /5) |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 3.6 | 4.2 |
| Customer Support | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| Customizability | 4.3 | 3.8 |
| Interoperability | 4.5 | 3.6 |
| Mobile Experience | 3.9 | 4.4 |
| Reporting & Analytics | 4.2 | 3.9 |
Integration & Interoperability
Epic:
- TEFCA-aligned and supports Carequality and CommonWell
- Supports FHIR APIs for third-party apps
- Integrates seamlessly with lab systems, radiology, billing, and population health tools
AdvancedMD:
- HL7 and FHIR API support
- Integrates with labs, pharmacies, QuickBooks, and payment gateways
- Lacks the deep hospital ecosystem connectivity Epic offers
Verdict: Epic leads in nationwide health data exchange; AdvancedMD offers flexible API access for outpatient apps.
Pricing and ROI
| Category | Epic | AdvancedMD |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Custom quote (based on size) | Subscription (per provider/month) |
| Estimated Range | $1,200–$1,500+ per provider/month | $429–$729/month (EHR + PM) |
| Setup Fee | High (implementation + servers) | Low (cloud setup) |
| Hidden Costs | Training, hardware, maintenance | Add-ons for RCM, telehealth |
| ROI Break-even Time | 18–24 months | 6–12 months |
ROI Note: AdvancedMD typically shows faster ROI for small practices due to its lightweight setup and lower cost barrier.
Security & Compliance
| Compliance Area | Epic | AdvancedMD |
|---|---|---|
| HIPAA-Compliant | ✅ | ✅ |
| SOC 2 Certification | ✅ | ✅ |
| TEFCA Compatibility | ✅ | ❌ (in progress) |
| 2FA and Role Controls | ✅ | ✅ |
| ONC-Certified | ✅ | ✅ |
Both vendors meet high standards for healthcare compliance, but Epic’s enterprise architecture adds additional audit and enterprise-level security layers.
Usability & Training
Epic
- Steep learning curve due to feature complexity
- Comprehensive training required (in-person or LMS)
- Dedicated IT team required for maintenance
AdvancedMD
- Faster onboarding (~30 days)
- Self-service portal, chat support
- Less IT dependency
Customer Support
| Support Factor | Epic | AdvancedMD |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation Team | Required (dedicated team) | Optional (remote onboarding) |
| 24/7 Support | For enterprise customers | Chat/email support weekdays |
| Resource Library | Yes (MyEpic, user forums) | Yes (videos, knowledge base) |
| Uptime Guarantee | ~99.9% | 99.99% (AWS-based) |
Pros and Cons
Epic
Pros:
- Unmatched scalability
- Deep specialty modules
- Interoperability leader
- Long-term ROI for large systems
Cons:
- Expensive setup
- Requires significant training
- Not ideal for small practices
AdvancedMD
Pros:
- Cost-effective and scalable
- Cloud-native with mobile-first UX
- Built-in billing and RCM tools
- Great for small to mid-sized clinics
Cons:
- Limited hospital-grade features
- Interoperability still growing
- Fewer specialty-specific customizations
Real-World Testimonials
Epic User (Academic Hospital):
“Epic connects everything from the ER to inpatient to outpatient. It’s a lot to learn, but it pays off in efficiency.”
AdvancedMD User (Pediatrician):
“Setup was quick. Billing is seamless. As a solo provider, I feel empowered, not overwhelmed.”
Final Recommendation: Which EHR Should You Choose?
| Practice Type | Best Fit EHR |
|---|---|
| Large Hospital | Epic |
| ACO or Multi-specialty Group | Epic |
| Small Private Practice | AdvancedMD |
| Mobile Clinics | AdvancedMD |
| Academic Institution | Epic |
| Behavioral Health Clinic | AdvancedMD |
Chart Suggestion: Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
| Year | Epic (Est.) | AdvancedMD (Est.) |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | $120,000+ | $12,000 |
| Year 3 | $360,000+ | $36,000 |
| Year 5 | $600,000+ | $60,000 |
You can visualize this as a line graph showing steep upfront costs for Epic and a steady, manageable curve for AdvancedMD.
Conclusion
Both Epic and AdvancedMD are powerful EHR platforms—but they’re built for different worlds. If you’re managing an enterprise-scale hospital system with complex workflows, Epic is unmatched in depth and interoperability. However, if you’re a small or mid-sized practice, AdvancedMD delivers the right balance of functionality, cost-efficiency, and ease of use.
Choose Epic if your priorities are:
✅ Scalable infrastructure
✅ Hospital-grade integration
✅ Advanced specialty workflows
Choose AdvancedMD if your priorities are:
✅ Cost control
✅ Cloud-based convenience
✅ Simplicity in clinical and billing workflows
Call to Action
Want to explore how AI Medical Scribes like DocScrib can enhance your EHR workflows—regardless of which EHR you choose?
👉 Book a personalized demo today
Visit DocScrib.com to learn more.